An Ohio woman, Rosemary Hayne, convicted of assault for throwing food at a Chipotle employee, has been handed a unique sentence by Judge Timothy Gilligan. Instead of serving a full jail term, Hayne has been ordered to work in a fast-food job for two months. This atypical punishment was suggested as a way to reduce her jail sentence.
The incident occurred on September 5 at a Chipotle in Parma, Ohio, and was captured on video, subsequently going viral on Reddit. Hayne, 39, engaged in a heated argument with then-manager Emily Russell, 26, over her burrito bowl order. Despite Russell's efforts to resolve the situation, Hayne escalated the confrontation, eventually throwing the food directly at Russell.
Russell, who claimed her face was burned by the hot contents of the burrito bowl, left her job at Chipotle, feeling unsupported by the company. The video captured the shock of other customers witnessing the incident, and the police were called.
During the court hearing, Hayne faced a fine and a 180-day jail sentence, with 90 days suspended. However, Judge Gilligan proposed a reduction of 60 days if Hayne agreed to work 20 hours a week in a fast-food job for 60 days before reporting to jail in March.
Hayne, who apologized in court, has reportedly attended job interviews, although it remains unclear if she has started her temporary fast-food employment. The judge criticized her behavior, stating, "You didn't get your burrito bowl the way you like it, and this is how you respond? This is not Real Housewives of Parma. This behavior is not acceptable."
Russell, now working at Raising Cane's, expressed satisfaction with the sentence, emphasizing the importance of justice for employees' well-being. Chipotle echoed this sentiment, highlighting the priority of their employees' health and safety.
While Hayne claimed dissatisfaction with her food order as the reason for her aggression, Judge Gilligan retorted, "I bet you won't be happy with the food you are going to get in jail." The sentencing reflects an attempt to align consequences with the nature of the offense, emphasizing the unacceptability of such behavior.