VANCOUVER - Premier David Eby has intensified his criticism of what he views as unequal federal funding distribution favoring Eastern Canada.
Eby accuses Ottawa of showing favoritism towards Quebec and Ontario, suggesting that the disparity has reached an unsustainable level. He dismissed Federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller's assertion that British Columbia's concerns are solely about asylum seekers as "disingenuous."
Tensions between Eby and Miller escalated following Eby's remarks at the Western Premiers' Conference, where he criticized Ottawa for lavishing funds on Ontario and Quebec. This critique came on the heels of Quebec receiving a $750 million deal to address immigration issues, prompting Miller to urge British Columbia to take in more asylum seekers.
Political analysts speculate that Eby's strong stance is partly motivated by the upcoming provincial election and a desire to distance himself from the unpopular federal Liberals.
In a statement on Wednesday, Eby rebuked Ottawa's priorities, highlighting federal investments in Ontario and Quebec, such as the $15 billion project for Honda's electric vehicle battery plant, backed by $5 billion in public funds.
Eby emphasized that while population growth is beneficial, it strains infrastructure, housing, and economic development. He argued that Western provinces receive disproportionately less federal support compared to their population and economic contributions.
Regarding asylum seekers, Eby pointed out a significant increase in their numbers arriving in British Columbia, doubling last year and expected to nearly double again this year. He cited data indicating 3,890 asylum claimants processed for B.C. in 2022, rising to 7,685 in 2023, compared to Quebec's numbers increasing from 58,800 to 65,425 in the same period.
In response, Minister Miller reiterated that funds allocated to Quebec are specifically for asylum seekers, noting Ontario and Quebec's disproportionate burden in hosting this population within Canada.
He emphasized the need for broader discussions on federal funding distribution, involving multiple ministers beyond his purview. Miller expressed surprise at Eby's criticism of the Quebec deal, describing it as unexpected from a progressive premier, while underscoring the importance of collaborative efforts moving forward.
Political analysts such as Gerald Baier from the University of British Columbia suggest that Eby's strategy aligns with traditional approaches of provincial leaders seeking more federal funding post-premiers' conferences, especially in an election year. Stewart Prest, also from UBC, highlighted the strategic value for Eby in asserting provincial interests firmly amidst potential electoral challenges and public sentiment against the federal Liberals.
In conclusion, Eby's critique underscores ongoing tensions over federal-provincial fiscal arrangements and policy priorities, reflecting broader political dynamics leading up to the provincial election.