In a nod to history, Hannah Sattler, donning a black-and-white Palestinian scarf, finds resonance with the tie-dye T-shirts of the 1960s amid widespread college protests against the Israel-Hamas conflict. Sattler, a Columbia University graduate student in international human rights policy, draws inspiration from the anti-Vietnam War demonstrations of the past.
Reflecting on the historical significance, Sattler underscores the symbolic connection between the present-day protests and those of the 1960s. She notes that the occupation of Hamilton Hall at Columbia University was a deliberate choice, aligning with the legacy of the '60s protests.
However, Robert Cohen, a history and social studies professor at New York University, cautions against overstating the comparison between current campus protests and the anti-Vietnam War movement. While acknowledging the magnitude of the present-day protests, Cohen highlights the disparity in scale compared to the tumultuous events of the Vietnam era.
Unlike the violent episodes of the past, today's demonstrations have remained largely peaceful. While there have been instances of police intervention and arrests, the level of violence pales in comparison to historical precedents such as the University of Wisconsin bombing in 1970 and the Kent State massacre.
Despite the relative calm, there is an underlying sense of apprehension among some observers, including Mark Naison, a Fordham University history professor who participated in the 1968 protests at Columbia University. Naison notes a prevailing fear that the current situation could escalate into tragedy at any moment.
The parallels between the present and the tumultuous '60s are evident in the sentiments expressed by the President's Commission on Campus Unrest in 1970. The commission's observation that American society was deeply divided resonates with the current climate of polarization and unrest.
While today's protests echo the activism of the past, there are notable differences. Robert Korstad, a Duke University professor emeritus who protested in the '60s, observes a shift in attitudes toward dissenting views. Unlike the inclusive approach of the Free Speech Movement at UC Berkeley, contemporary protesters are sometimes dismissive of opposing perspectives.
One key aspect of the current protests is the focus on divestment from companies associated with the Israel-Hamas conflict. At MIT, students are calling for an end to research contracts with Israel's Ministry of Defence, drawing inspiration from past movements against apartheid in South Africa.
However, the success of these divestment efforts remains uncertain, given the widespread support for Israel. Cohen emphasizes the geopolitical complexities at play and suggests that significant changes are unlikely at most campuses.
Despite the challenges, students like Sattler remain committed to their cause, drawing inspiration from the activism of previous generations. While some, like Sattler, are prepared for the possibility of arrest, others, such as Brayden Lang, a freshman at Northern Arizona University, are more cautious about the extent of their involvement.
Ultimately, today's campus protests, while reminiscent of past movements, are characterized by a unique set of challenges and dynamics. As students navigate the complexities of contemporary activism, they draw upon the lessons of history while forging their own path forward.