Last week, the government of British Columbia made public its plans to establish a dedicated area for medical assistance in dying (MAiD) at St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver. However, Dr. Jyothi Jayaraman asserts that this move is not a compromise but rather a concession on the part of Minister Adrian Dix and the province.
Dr. Jayaraman, who left her palliative care position earlier this summer after her hospice ceased offering MAiD due to new religious affiliations, emphasizes that St. Paul’s Hospital is affiliated with Providence Health, a Catholic organization prohibiting MAiD despite federal legislation permitting it. Health Minister Adrian Dix had previously expressed discussions with the hospital on accommodating MAiD.
The announcement of a separate space, distinct from the existing hospital but adjacent to it with a connecting corridor, has faced criticism. Dr. Jayaraman expresses concern about the inconvenience for patients, noting that even if the facility appears luxurious, the primary issue lies in the discomfort patients might endure during transportation.
She finds the provincial announcement disappointing, citing its failure to address forced transfers at other hospitals in British Columbia. Since June, she has personally overseen the transfer of eight patients to facilities allowing MAiD, extending beyond St. Paul’s to locations like Mount St. Joseph’s, various lodges, and the Rotary Hospice in Richmond.
Dr. Jayaraman underscores the emotional difficulty healthcare professionals experience in facilitating forced transfers, particularly given the traumatic impact on patients during their final moments. She argues that, in publicly funded facilities, religious affiliations should not impede individuals from accessing necessary services, emphasizing the need to halt such practices.
In response to these concerns, Dr. Jayaraman and others have joined forces with the Dying with Dignity organization, collaborating with a legal team to pursue a constitutional challenge. Helen Long, the organization's CEO, aims to file the challenge within the next few months, emphasizing the right of any taxpayer to access essential services in publicly funded facilities regardless of religious affiliations.
As of now, the B.C. government is yet to provide a response, despite inquiries from CTV News. The ongoing debate reflects the complex intersection of healthcare, religious affiliations, and patient rights in the context of end-of-life care.